Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) B. Hoeneisen
Request for Comments: 6118 Ucom.ch
Updates: 3762, 3764, 3953, 4143, 4002, A. Mayrhofer
4238, 4355, 4415, 4769, 4969, enum.at
4979, 5028, 5278, 5333 March 2011
Category: Standards Track
ISSN: 2070-1721
Update of Legacy IANA Registrations of Enumservices
Abstract
This document revises all Enumservices that were IANA registered
under the now obsolete specification of the Enumservice registry
defined in RFC 3761.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6118.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
Contributions published or made publicly available before November
10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
than English.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. IESG Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4. Legacy Enumservice Registrations Converted to XML Chunks . . . 5
4.1. email:mailto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.2. ems:mailto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.3. ems:tel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4.4. fax:tel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.5. ft:ftp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.6. h323 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.7. ical-access:http . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.8. ical-access:https . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.9. ical-sched:mailto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.10. ifax:mailto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4.11. im . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
4.12. mms:mailto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
4.13. mms:tel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.14. pres . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
4.15. pstn:sip . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4.16. pstn:tel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
4.17. sip . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
4.18. sms:mailto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
4.19. sms:tel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
4.20. unifmsg:http . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4.21. unifmsg:https . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
4.22. unifmsg:sip . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
4.23. unifmsg:sips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
4.24. vcard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
4.25. videomsg:http . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
4.26. videomsg:https . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
4.27. videomsg:sip . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
4.28. videomsg:sips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
4.29. voice:tel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
4.30. voicemsg:http . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.31. voicemsg:https . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
4.32. voicemsg:sip . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
4.33. voicemsg:sips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
4.34. voicemsg:tel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
4.35. vpim:ldap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
4.36. vpim:mailto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.37. web:http . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
4.38. web:https . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
4.39. xmpp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Appendix A. Former Content of the IANA Repository . . . . . . . . 49
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
1. Introduction
[RFC 6117] has obsoleted the IANA registration section of [RFC 3761].
Since the IANA Enumservice registry contains various Enumservices
registered under the regime of RFC 3761, those registrations do not
conform to the new guidelines as specified in [RFC 6117]. To ensure
consistency among all Enumservice registrations at IANA, this
document adds the (nowadays) missing elements to those legacy
registrations. Furthermore, all legacy Enumservice registrations are
converted to the new XML-chunk format, and, where deemed necessary,
minor editorial corrections are applied.
However, this document only adds the missing elements to the XML
chunks as specified in the IANA Considerations section of [RFC 6117],
but it does not complete the (nowadays) missing sections of the
corresponding Enumservice Specifications. In order to conform with
the new registration regime as specified in [RFC 6117], those
Enumservice Specifications still have to be revised.
It is important to note that this document does not update the
functional specification of the concerned Enumservices.
The following RFCs are updated by this document:
o [RFC 3762]
o [RFC 3764]
o [RFC 3953]
o [RFC 4143]
o [RFC 4002]
o [RFC 4238]
o [RFC 4355]
o [RFC 4415]
o [RFC 4769]
o [RFC 4969]
o [RFC 4979]
o [RFC 5028]
o [RFC 5278]
o [RFC 5333]
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC 2119].
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
3. IESG Action
According to [RFC 3761], any Enumservice registration had to be
published as a Standards Track, Experimental, or BCP (Best Current
Practice) RFC. [RFC 6117] no longer has this requirement, i.e.,
"Specification Required", which implies the use of a Designated
Expert [RFC 5226], is sufficient.
This document changes the approval requirement for updates to
Enumservice registrations to Specification Required, whereby the
specification and request are reviewed by a Designated Expert as
described in [RFC 6117].
4. Legacy Enumservice Registrations Converted to XML Chunks
In the following, the legacy Enumservice Registrations are converted
to XML chunks that include the new elements introduced by [RFC 6117].
(Note that references in Sections 4.1 - 4.39 refer to the references
section within the respective Enumservice Specification.)
4.1. email:mailto
<record>
<!-- email:mailto -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>email</type>
<subtype>mailto</subtype>
<urischeme>mailto</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource can be
addressed by the associated URI in order to send an
email.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/>, Section 6.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Rudolf_Brandner"/>
<xref type="person" data="Lawrence_Conroy"/>
<xref type="person" data="Richard_Stastny"/>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
</requesters>
</record>
4.2. ems:mailto
<record>
<!-- ems:mailto -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>ems</type>
<subtype>mailto</subtype>
<urischeme>mailto</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource
identified by the associated URI is capable
of receiving a message using an email protocol.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
EMS content is sent over SMTP using the format
specified by TS 23.140 [15] Section 8.4.4 and TS
26.140 [16] Section 4, as an MMS message. Within
such a message, EMS content is carried as either a
text or application/octet-stream MIME sub-part (see
TS 26.140 [16], Section 4.1).
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
<paragraph>
There are no specific security issues with this
Enumservice. However, the general considerations of
Section 6 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/> apply.
</paragraph>
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Rudolf_Brandner"/>
<xref type="person" data="Lawrence_Conroy"/>
<xref type="person" data="Richard_Stastny"/>
</requesters>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.3. ems:tel
<record>
<!-- ems:tel -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>ems</type>
<subtype>tel</subtype>
<urischeme>tel</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource
identified by the associated URI is capable
of receiving a message using the Enhanced Message
Service (EMS) [14].
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
<paragraph>
There are no specific security issues with this
Enumservice. However, the general considerations of
Section 6 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/> apply.
</paragraph>
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Rudolf_Brandner"/>
<xref type="person" data="Lawrence_Conroy"/>
<xref type="person" data="Richard_Stastny"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
Note that an indication of EMS can be taken as
implying that the recipient is capable of receiving
SMS messages at this address as well.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.4. fax:tel
<record>
<!-- fax:tel -->
<class>Application-Based, Subset</class>
<type>fax</type>
<subtype>tel</subtype>
<urischeme>tel</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource
identified by the associated URI is capable
of being contacted to provide a communication
session during which facsimile documents can be
sent.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
A client selecting this NAPTR will have support
for generating and sending facsimile documents to
the recipient using the PSTN session and transfer
protocols specified in [12] and [13] in
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/> -
in short, they will have a fax program with a local
or shared PSTN access over which they can send
faxes.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/>, Section 6.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Rudolf_Brandner"/>
<xref type="person" data="Lawrence_Conroy"/>
<xref type="person" data="Richard_Stastny"/>
</requesters>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.5. ft:ftp
<record>
<!-- ft:ftp -->
<class>Application-Based, Subset</class>
<type>ft</type>
<subtype>ftp</subtype>
<urischeme>ftp</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource
identified by the associated URI is a file
service from which a file or file listing can be
retrieved.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4002"/>, Section 5.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4002"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Rudolf_Brandner"/>
<xref type="person" data="Lawrence_Conroy"/>
<xref type="person" data="Richard_Stastny"/>
</requesters>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.6. h323
<record>
<!-- h323 -->
<class>Protocol-Based</class>
<type>h323</type>
<!-- No subtype -->
<urischeme>h323</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 3762"/>, Section 3.
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 3762"/>, Section 5.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 3762"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Orit_Levin"/>
</requesters>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.7. ical-access:http
<record>
<!-- ical-access:http -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>ical-access</type>
<subtype>http</subtype>
<urischeme>http</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified
can be addressed by the associated URI in order to access
a user's calendar (for example free/busy status) using
the CalDAV [7] protocol for Internet calendaring.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5333"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5333"/>, Section 4.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5333"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Rohan_Mahy"/>
</requesters>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.8. ical-access:https
<record>
<!-- ical-access:https -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>ical-access</type>
<subtype>https</subtype>
<urischeme>https</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified
can be addressed by the associated URI in order to access
a user's calendar (for example free/busy status) using
the CalDAV [7] protocol for Internet calendaring.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5333"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5333"/>, Section 4.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5333"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Rohan_Mahy"/>
</requesters>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.9. ical-sched:mailto
<record>
<!-- ical-sched:mailto -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>ical-sched</type>
<subtype>mailto</subtype>
<urischeme>mailto</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified
can be addressed by the associated URI used for
scheduling using Internet calendaring via Internet mail
with the iMIP [6] protocol.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5333"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5333"/>, Section 4.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5333"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Rohan_Mahy"/>
</requesters>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.10. ifax:mailto
<record>
<!-- ifax:mailto -->
<class>Application-Based, Subset</class>
<type>ifax</type>
<subtype>mailto</subtype>
<urischeme>mailto</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4143"/>, Section 1.
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4143"/>, Section 3.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4143"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Kiyoshi_Toyoda"/>
<xref type="person" data="Dave_Crocker"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
The URI Scheme is 'mailto' because facsimile is a
profile of standard Internet mail and uses standard
Internet mail addressing.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.11. im
<record>
<!-- im -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>im</type>
<!-- No subtype -->
<urischeme>im</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource
identified is an 'im:' URI. The 'im:' URI scheme
does not identify any particular protocol that will
be used to handle instant messaging receipt or
delivery, rather the mechanism in RFC 3861 [4] is
used to discover whether an IM protocol supported by
the party querying ENUM is also supported by the
target resource.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5028"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5028"/>, Section 3.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5028"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Rohan_Mahy"/>
</requesters>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.12. mms:mailto
<record>
<!-- mms:mailto -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>mms</type>
<subtype>mailto</subtype>
<urischeme>mailto</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource
identified by the associated URI is capable
of receiving a message using an email protocol.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
MMS messages are sent over SMTP using the format
specified by TS 23.140 [15] Section 8.4.4 and TS
26.140 [16] Section 4.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
Within and between MMS Environments (MMSE,
network infrastructures that support the MultiMedia
Service), other pieces of state data (for example,
charging-significant information) are exchanged
between MMS Relay Servers. Thus, although these
servers use SMTP as the "bearer" for their
application exchanges, they map their internal state
to specialized header fields carried in the SMTP message
exchanges. The header fields used in such MMSE are
described in detail in [17].
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
<paragraph>
There are no specific security issues with this
Enumservice. However, the general considerations of
Section 6 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/> apply.
</paragraph>
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
<xref type="person" data="Rudolf_Brandner"/>
<xref type="person" data="Lawrence_Conroy"/>
<xref type="person" data="Richard_Stastny"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
The MMS Architecture describes an interface
between the MMSE and "legacy messaging systems"
(labelled as MM3) that accepts "standard" SMTP
messages. Thus, although the MMS Relay Server that
supports this interface appears as a standard SMTP
server from the perspective of an Internet-based
mail server, it acts as a gateway and translator,
adding the internal state data that is used within
and between the MMS Environments. This mechanism is
described in [17], which also includes references to
the specifications agreed by those bodies
responsible for the design of the MMS.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/>.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.13. mms:tel
<record>
<!-- mms:tel -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>mms</type>
<subtype>tel</subtype>
<urischeme>tel</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource
identified by the associated URI is capable
of receiving a message using the Multimedia
Messaging Service (MMS) [15].
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
<paragraph>
There are no specific security issues with this
Enumservice. However, the general considerations of
Section 6 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/> apply.
</paragraph>
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Rudolf_Brandner"/>
<xref type="person" data="Lawrence_Conroy"/>
<xref type="person" data="Richard_Stastny"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
Note that MMS can be used as an alternative to
deliver an SMS RP-DATA RPDU if, for example, the
SMS bearer is not supported. If an entry includes
this Enumservice, then in effect this can be taken
as implying that the recipient is capable of
receiving EMS or SMS messages at this address. Such
choices on the end system design do have two small
caveats; whilst in practice all terminals supporting
MMS today support SMS as well, it might not
necessarily be the case in the future, and there may
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
be tariff differences in using the MMS rather than
using the SMS or EMS.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
4.14. pres
<record>
<!-- pres -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>pres</type>
<!-- No subtype -->
<urischeme>pres</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 3953"/>, Section 4.
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 3953"/>, Section 6.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 3953"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Jon_Peterson"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 3953"/>, Section 3.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.15. pstn:sip
<record>
<!-- pstn:sip -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>pstn</type>
<subtype>sip</subtype>
<urischeme>sip</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
These Enumservices indicate that the
resource identified can be addressed by the
associated URI in order to initiate a
telecommunication session, which may include two-way
voice or other communications, to the PSTN.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4769"/>, Section 7.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4769"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Jason_Livingood"/>
<xref type="person" data="Richard_Shockey"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
A Number Portability Dip Indicator (npdi) should
be used in practice
(see <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4769"/>, Section 4).
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.16. pstn:tel
<record>
<!-- pstn:tel -->
<class>Application-Based, Ancillary</class>
<type>pstn</type>
<subtype>tel</subtype>
<urischeme>tel</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
These Enumservices indicate that the
resource identified can be addressed by the
associated URI in order to initiate a
telecommunication session, which may include two-way
voice or other communications, to the PSTN. These
URIs may contain number portability data as
specified in RFC 4694 [10].
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4769"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4769"/>, Section 7.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4769"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Jason_Livingood"/>
<xref type="person" data="Richard_Shockey"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
A Number Portability Dip Indicator (npdi) should
be used in practice
(see <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4769"/>, Section 4).
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.17. sip
<record>
<!-- sip -->
<class>Protocol-Based</class>
<type>sip</type>
<!-- No subtype -->
<urischeme>sip</urischeme>
<urischeme>sips</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 3764"/>, Section 4.
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 3764"/>, Section 6.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 3764"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Jon_Peterson"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 3764"/>, Section 3.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.18. sms:mailto
<record>
<!-- sms:mailto -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>sms</type>
<subtype>mailto</subtype>
<urischeme>mailto</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource
identified by the associated URI is capable
of receiving a message using an email protocol.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
SMS content is sent over SMTP using the format
specified by TS 23.140 [15] Section 8.4.4 and TS
26.140 [16] Section 4, as an MMS message. Within
such a message, SMS content is carried as either a
text or application/octet-stream MIME sub-part (see
TS 26.140 [16], Section 4.1)
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
<paragraph>
There are no specific security issues with this
Enumservice. However, the general considerations of
Section 6 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/> apply.
</paragraph>
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Rudolf_Brandner"/>
<xref type="person" data="Lawrence_Conroy"/>
<xref type="person" data="Richard_Stastny"/>
</requesters>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.19. sms:tel
<record>
<!-- sms:tel -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>sms</type>
<subtype>tel</subtype>
<urischeme>tel</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource
identified by the associated URI is capable
of receiving a message using the Short Message
Service (SMS) [14].
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
<paragraph>
There are no specific security issues with this
Enumservice. However, the general considerations of
Section 6 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/> apply.
</paragraph>
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4355"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Rudolf_Brandner"/>
<xref type="person" data="Lawrence_Conroy"/>
<xref type="person" data="Richard_Stastny"/>
</requesters>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.20. unifmsg:http
<record>
<!-- unifmsg:http -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>unifmsg</type>
<subtype>http</subtype>
<urischeme>http</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified by
the associated URI scheme is capable of being a source of
information.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
Note that the kind of information retrieved can be manifold.
Usually, contacting a resource by an 'http:' [11] URI
provides a document. This document can contain references
that will trigger the download of many different kinds of
information, such as text, audio, video, executable code, or
even video message files. Thus, one cannot be more specific
about the kind of information expected when contacting the
resource.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>, Section 3.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Jason_Livingood"/>
<xref type="person" data="Don_Troshynski"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
in Section 7 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.21. unifmsg:https
<record>
<!-- unifmsg:https -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>unifmsg</type>
<subtype>https</subtype>
<urischeme>https</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified by
the associated URI scheme is capable of being a source of
information, which can be contacted using TLS or the Secure
Socket Layer protocol.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
Note that the kind of information retrieved can be manifold.
Usually, contacting a resource by an 'https:' [12] URI
provides a document. This document can contain references
that will trigger the download of many different kinds of
information, such as text, audio, video, executable code, or
even video message files. Thus, one cannot be more specific
about the kind of information expected when contacting the
resource.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>, Section 3.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Jason_Livingood"/>
<xref type="person" data="Don_Troshynski"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
in Section 7 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.22. unifmsg:sip
<record>
<!-- unifmsg:sip -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>unifmsg</type>
<subtype>sip</subtype>
<urischeme>sip</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified can
be addressed by the associated URI scheme in order to
initiate a unified communication session to a unified
messaging system.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>, Section 3.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Jason_Livingood"/>
<xref type="person" data="Don_Troshynski"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
in Section 7 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 27]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.23. unifmsg:sips
<record>
<!-- unifmsg:sips -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>unifmsg</type>
<subtype>sips</subtype>
<urischeme>sips</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified can
be addressed by the associated URI scheme in order to
initiate a unified communication session to a unified
messaging system.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>, Section 3.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Jason_Livingood"/>
<xref type="person" data="Don_Troshynski"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
in Section 7 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 28]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.24. vcard
<record>
<!-- vcard -->
<class>Data Type-Based</class>
<type>vcard</type>
<!-- No subtype -->
<urischeme>http</urischeme>
<urischeme>https</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource
identified is a plain vCard, according to RFC 2426,
which may be accessed using HTTP / HTTPS [7].
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
Clients fetching the vCard from the resource
indicated should expect access to be
restricted. Additionally, the comprehension of the
data provided may vary depending on the client's
identity.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4969"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4969"/>, Section 5.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4969"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Alexander_Mayrhofer"/>
</requesters>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 29]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.25. videomsg:http
<record>
<!-- videomsg:http -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>videomsg</type>
<subtype>http</subtype>
<urischeme>http</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified by
the associated URI scheme is capable of being a source of
information.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
Note that the kind of information retrieved can be manifold.
Usually, contacting a resource by an 'http:' [11] URI
provides a document. This document can contain references
that will trigger the download of many different kinds of
information, such as text, audio, video, executable code, or
even video message files. Thus, one cannot be more specific
about the kind of information expected when contacting the
resource.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>, Section 3.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Jason_Livingood"/>
<xref type="person" data="Don_Troshynski"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
in Section 7 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 30]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.26. videomsg:https
<record>
<!-- videomsg:https -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>videomsg</type>
<subtype>https</subtype>
<urischeme>https</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified by
the associated URI scheme is capable of being a source of
information, which can be contacted using TLS or the Secure
Socket Layer protocol.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
Note that the kind of information retrieved can be manifold.
Usually, contacting a resource by an 'https:' [12] URI
provides a document. This document can contain references
that will trigger the download of many different kinds of
information, such as text, audio, video, executable code, or
even video message files. Thus, one cannot be more specific
about the kind of information expected when contacting the
resource.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>, Section 3.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Jason_Livingood"/>
<xref type="person" data="Don_Troshynski"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
in Section 7 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 31]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.27. videomsg:sip
<record>
<!-- videomsg:sip -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>videomsg</type>
<subtype>sip</subtype>
<urischeme>sip</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified can
be addressed by the associated URI scheme in order to
initiate a video communication session to a video messaging
system.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>, Section 3.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Jason_Livingood"/>
<xref type="person" data="Don_Troshynski"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
in Section 7 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 32]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.28. videomsg:sips
<record>
<!-- videomsg:sips -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>videomsg</type>
<subtype>sips</subtype>
<urischeme>sips</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified can
be addressed by the associated URI scheme in order to
initiate a video communication session to a video messaging
system.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>, Section 3.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Jason_Livingood"/>
<xref type="person" data="Don_Troshynski"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
in Section 7 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 33]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.29. voice:tel
<record>
<!-- voice:tel -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>voice</type>
<subtype>tel</subtype>
<urischeme>tel</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
The kind of communication indicated by this
Enumservice is "Interactive Voice". From a protocol
perspective, this communication is expected to
involve bidirectional media streams carrying audio
data.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
A client may imply that the person controlling
population of a NAPTR holding this Enumservice
indicates their capability to engage in an
interactive voice session when contacted using the
URI generated by this NAPTR.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4415"/>, Section 5.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4415"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Rudolf_Brandner"/>
<xref type="person" data="Lawrence_Conroy"/>
<xref type="person" data="Richard_Stastny"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the person
responsible for the NAPTR is accessible via the PSTN
(Public Switched Telephone Network) or PLMN (Public
Land Mobile Network) using the value of the
generated URI.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>The kind of subsystem required to initiate a
Voice Enumservice with this Subtype is a "Dialler".
This is a subsystem that either provides a local
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 34]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
connection to the PSTN or PLMN, or that provides an
indirect connection to those networks. The
subsystem will use the telephone number held in the
generated URI to place a voice call. The voice call
is placed to a network that uses E.164 numbers to
route calls to an appropriate destination.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
Note that the PSTN/PLMN connection may be
indirect. The end user receiving this NAPTR may
have a relationship with a Communications Service
Provider that accepts call initiation requests from
that subsystem using an IP-based protocol such as
SIP or H.323, and places the call to the PSTN using
a remote gateway service. In this case, the Provider
may either accept requests using "tel:" URIs or has
a defined mechanism to convert "tel:" URI values
into a "protocol-native" form.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
The "tel:" URI value SHOULD be fully qualified
(using the "global phone number" form of RFC 3966
[10]). A "local phone number" as defined in that
document SHOULD NOT be used unless the controller of
the zone in which the NAPTR appears is sure that it
can be distinguished unambiguously by all clients
that can access the resource record and that a call
from their network access points can be routed to
that destination.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4415"/>.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 35]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.30. voicemsg:http
<record>
<!-- voicemsg:http -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>voicemsg</type>
<subtype>http</subtype>
<urischeme>http</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified by
the associated URI scheme is capable of being a source of
information.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
Note that the kind of information retrieved can be manifold.
Usually, contacting a resource by an 'http:' [11] URI
provides a document. This document can contain references
that will trigger the download of many different kinds of
information, such as text, audio, video, executable code, or
even voice message files. Thus, one cannot be more specific
about the kind of information expected when contacting the
resource.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>, Section 3.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Jason_Livingood"/>
<xref type="person" data="Don_Troshynski"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
in Section 7 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 36]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.31. voicemsg:https
<record>
<!-- voicemsg:https -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>voicemsg</type>
<subtype>https</subtype>
<urischeme>https</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified by
the associated URI scheme is capable of being a source of
information, which can be contacted using TLS or the Secure
Socket Layer protocol.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
Note that the kind of information retrieved can be manifold.
Usually, contacting a resource by an 'https:' [12] URI
provides a document. This document can contain references
that will trigger the download of many different kinds of
information, such as text, audio, video, executable code, or
even voice message files. Thus, one cannot be more specific
about the kind of information expected when contacting the
resource.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
References are contained in <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>, Section 3.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Jason_Livingood"/>
<xref type="person" data="Don_Troshynski"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
in Section 7 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 37]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.32. voicemsg:sip
<record>
<!-- voicemsg:sip -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>voicemsg</type>
<subtype>sip</subtype>
<urischeme>sip</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified can
be addressed by the associated URI scheme in order to
initiate a voice communication session to a voice messaging
system.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>, Section 3.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Jason_Livingood"/>
<xref type="person" data="Don_Troshynski"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
in Section 7 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 38]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.33. voicemsg:sips
<record>
<!-- voicemsg:sips -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>voicemsg</type>
<subtype>sips</subtype>
<urischeme>sips</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified can
be addressed by the associated URI scheme in order to
initiate a voice communication session to a voice messaging
system.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>, Section 3.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Jason_Livingood"/>
<xref type="person" data="Don_Troshynski"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
in Section 7 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 39]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.34. voicemsg:tel
<record>
<!-- voicemsg:tel -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>voicemsg</type>
<subtype>tel</subtype>
<urischeme>tel</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified can
be addressed by the associated URI scheme in order to
initiate a voice communication session to a voice messaging
system.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>, Section 3.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Jason_Livingood"/>
<xref type="person" data="Don_Troshynski"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
in Section 7 of <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 5278"/>.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 40]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.35. vpim:ldap
<record>
<!-- vpim:ldap -->
<class>Data Type-Based</class>
<type>vpim</type>
<subtype>ldap</subtype>
<urischeme>ldap</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4238"/>, Section 3.2 - 3.3.
</functionalspec>
<security>
<paragraph>
Malicious Redirection:
One of the fundamental dangers related to any
service such as this is that a malicious entry in a
resolver's database will cause clients to resolve
the E.164 into the wrong LDAP URI. The possible
intent may be to cause the client to connect to a
rogue LDAP server and retrieve (or fail to retrieve)
a resource containing fraudulent or damaging
information.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
Denial of Service:
By removing the URI to which the E.164 maps, a
malicious intruder may remove the client's ability
to access the LDAP directory server.
</paragraph>
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4238"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Greg_Vaudreuil"/>
</requesters>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 41]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.36. vpim:mailto
<record>
<!-- vpim:mailto -->
<class>Data Type-Based</class>
<type>vpim</type>
<subtype>mailto</subtype>
<urischeme>mailto</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4238"/>, Section 4.2 - 4.4.
</functionalspec>
<security>
<paragraph>
Malicious Redirection:
One of the fundamental dangers related to any
service such as this is that a malicious entry in a
resolver's database will cause clients to resolve
the E.164 into the wrong email URI. The possible
intent may be to cause the client to send the
information to an incorrect destination.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
Denial of Service:
By removing the URI to which the E.164 maps, a
malicious intruder may remove the client's ability
to access the resource.
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
Unsolicited Bulk Email:
The exposure of email addresses through the ENUM
service provides a bulk mailer access to large
numbers of email addresses where only the telephone
number was previously known.
</paragraph>
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4238"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Greg_Vaudreuil"/>
</requesters>
<additionalinfo>
<paragraph>
Error Conditions:
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 42]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
E.164 number not in the numbering plan
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
E.164 number in the numbering plan, but no
URIs exist for that number
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
E2U+vpim:mailto Service unavailable of email
addresses where only the telephone number was
previously known.
</paragraph>
</additionalinfo>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 43]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.37. web:http
<record>
<!-- web:http -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>web</type>
<subtype>http</subtype>
<urischeme>http</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource
identified by the associated URI is capable
of being a source of information. It has to be
noted that the kind of information retrieved can be
manifold. Usually, contacting a resource by an
"http:" URI provides a document. This document can
contain references that will trigger download of
many different kinds of information, like audio or
video or executable code. Thus, one cannot be more
specific about the kind of information that can be
expected when contacting the resource.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4002"/>, Section 5.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4002"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Rudolf_Brandner"/>
<xref type="person" data="Lawrence_Conroy"/>
<xref type="person" data="Richard_Stastny"/>
</requesters>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 44]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.38. web:https
<record>
<!-- web:https -->
<class>Application-Based, Common</class>
<type>web</type>
<subtype>https</subtype>
<urischeme>https</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource
identified by the associated URI is capable
of being a source of information, which can be
contacted by using TLS or the Secure Socket Layer
protocol. It has to be noted that the kind of
information retrieved can be manifold. Usually,
contacting a resource by an "https:" URI provides a
document. This document can contain all different
kinds of information, like audio or video or
executable code. Thus, one cannot be more specific
what information to expect when contacting the
resource.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4002"/>, Section 5.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4002"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Rudolf_Brandner"/>
<xref type="person" data="Lawrence_Conroy"/>
<xref type="person" data="Richard_Stastny"/>
</requesters>
</record>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 45]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
4.39. xmpp
<record>
<!-- xmpp -->
<class>Protocol-Based</class>
<type>xmpp</type>
<!-- No subtype -->
<urischeme>xmpp</urischeme>
<functionalspec>
<paragraph>
This Enumservice indicates that the resource
identified is an XMPP entity.
</paragraph>
</functionalspec>
<security>
See <xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4979"/>, Section 6.
</security>
<usage>COMMON</usage>
<registrationdocs>
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 4979"/> (updated by RFC 6118)
<xref type="rfc" data="RFC 6118"/>
</registrationdocs>
<requesters>
<xref type="person" data="Alexander_Mayrhofer"/>
</requesters>
</record>
5. IANA Considerations
IANA replaced all legacy Enumservice Registrations as per Section 4.
6. Security Considerations
Since this document does not introduce any technology or protocol,
there are no security issues to be considered for this document
itself.
7. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the following people who have
provided feedback or significant contributions to the development of
this document: Jari Arkko, Scott Bradner, Gonzalo Camarillo, Alfred
Hoenes, Ari Keranen, and Alexey Melnikov.
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 46]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
8. References
8.1. Normative References
[RFC 2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, October 1996.
[RFC 2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC 3761] Faltstrom, P. and M. Mealling, "The E.164 to Uniform
Resource Identifiers (URI) Dynamic Delegation Discovery
System (DDDS) Application (ENUM)", RFC 3761, April 2004.
[RFC 3762] Levin, O., "Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service
Registration for H.323", RFC 3762, April 2004.
[RFC 3764] Peterson, J., "enumservice registration for Session
Initiation Protocol (SIP) Addresses-of-Record", RFC 3764,
April 2004.
[RFC 3953] Peterson, J., "Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service
Registration for Presence Services", RFC 3953,
January 2005.
[RFC 4002] Brandner, R., Conroy, L., and R. Stastny, "IANA
Registration for Enumservice 'web' and 'ft'", RFC 4002,
February 2005.
[RFC 4143] Toyoda, K. and D. Crocker, "Facsimile Using Internet Mail
(IFAX) Service of ENUM", RFC 4143, November 2005.
[RFC 4238] Vaudreuil, G., "Voice Message Routing Service", RFC 4238,
October 2005.
[RFC 4355] Brandner, R., Conroy, L., and R. Stastny, "IANA
Registration for Enumservices email, fax, mms, ems, and
sms", RFC 4355, January 2006.
[RFC 4415] Brandner, R., Conroy, L., and R. Stastny, "IANA
Registration for Enumservice Voice", RFC 4415,
February 2006.
[RFC 4769] Livingood, J. and R. Shockey, "IANA Registration for an
Enumservice Containing Public Switched Telephone Network
(PSTN) Signaling Information", RFC 4769, November 2006.
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 47]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
[RFC 4969] Mayrhofer, A., "IANA Registration for vCard Enumservice",
RFC 4969, August 2007.
[RFC 4979] Mayrhofer, A., "IANA Registration for Enumservice 'XMPP'",
RFC 4979, August 2007.
[RFC 5028] Mahy, R., "A Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service
Registration for Instant Messaging (IM) Services",
RFC 5028, October 2007.
[RFC 5278] Livingood, J. and D. Troshynski, "IANA Registration of
Enumservices for Voice and Video Messaging", RFC 5278,
July 2008.
[RFC 5333] Mahy, R. and B. Hoeneisen, "IANA Registration of
Enumservices for Internet Calendaring", RFC 5333,
October 2009.
[RFC 6117] Hoeneisen, B., Mayrhofer, A., and J. Livingood, "IANA
Registration of Enumservices: Guide, Template, and IANA
Considerations", RFC 6117, March 2011.
8.2. Informative References
[RFC 5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
May 2008.
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 48]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Appendix A. Former Content of the IANA Repository
Enumservice Registrations
(last updated 2009-10-13)
Registries included below:
- Enumservice Registrations
Registry Name: Enumservice Registrations
Reference: [RFC 3761]
Registration Procedures: Require an RFC approved by the IESG
Note:
Enumservice specifications contain the functional specification (i.e.
what it can be used for), the valid protocols, and the URI schemes
that may be returned.
Registry:
Service Name: "H323"
URI Scheme(s): "h323:"
Functional Specification:
See Section "3. The E2U+H323 ENUM Service" of [RFC 3762]
Security considerations:
see section "5. Security Considerations" of [RFC 3762]
Intended usage: COMMON
Author: Orit Levin
[RFC 3762]
Service Name: "SIP"
Type(s): "SIP"
Subtype(s): N/A
URI Scheme(s): "sip", "sips:"
Functional Specification: see Section 4 of [RFC 3764]
Security considerations: see Section 6 of [RFC 3764]
Intended usage: COMMON
Author: Jon Peterson (jon.peterson&neustar.biz)
Any other information that the author deems interesting:
see Section 3 of [RFC 3764]
[RFC 3764]
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 49]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Service Name: "ifax"
Type: "ifax"
Subtype: "mailto"
URI Scheme: "mailto"
The URI Scheme is "mailto" because facsimile is a profile of
standard Internet mail and uses standard Internet mail
addressing.
Functional Specification: see section 1 of [RFC 4143]
Security Considerations: see section 3 of [RFC 4143]
Intended usage: COMMON
Author: Kiyoshi Toyoda(toyoda.kiyoshi&jp.panasonic.com)
Dave Crocker(dcrocker&brandenburg.com)
[RFC 4143]
Service Name: "pres"
URI Scheme(s): "pres:"
Functional Specification: see Section 4 of [RFC 3953]
Security considerations: see Section 6 of [RFC 3953]
Intended usage: COMMON
Author: Jon Peterson (jon.peterson&neustar.biz)
Any other information that the author deems interesting:
See Section 3 of [RFC 3953]
[RFC 3953]
Service Name: "web"
Type: "web"
Subtype: "http"
URI Scheme: 'http:'
Functional Specification:
This ENUMservice indicates that the resource identified by the
associated URI scheme is capable of being a source of
information. It has to be noted that the kind of information
retrieved can be manifold. Usually, contacting a resource by an
'http:' URI provides a document. This document can contain
references that will trigger download of many different kinds
of information, like audio or video or executable code. Thus,
one can not be more specific about the kind of information that
can be expected when contacting the resource.
Security Considerations:
See section 5 of [RFC 4002].
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Rudolf Brandner (rudolf.brandner&siemens.com)
Lawrence Conroy (lwc&roke.co.uk)
Richard Stastny (richard.stastny&oefeg.at)
Any other information the author deems interesting: None
[RFC 4002]
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 50]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Service Name: "web"
Type: "web"
Subtype: "https"
URI Scheme: 'https:'
Functional Specification:
This ENUMservice indicates that the resource identified by the
associated URI scheme is capable of being a source of
information, which can be contacted by using TLS or Secure
Socket Layer protocol. It has to be noted that the kind of
information retrieved can be manifold. Usually, contacting a
resource by an 'https:' URI provides a document. This document
can contain all different kind of information, like audio or
video or executable code. Thus, one can not be more specific
what information to expect when contacting the resource.
Security Considerations:
See section 5 of [RFC 4002].
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Rudolf Brandner (rudolf.brandner&siemens.com)
Lawrence Conroy (lwc&roke.co.uk)
Richard Stastny (richard.stastny&oefeg.at)
Any other information the author deems interesting: None
[RFC 4002]
Service Name: "ft"
Type: "ft"
Subtype: "ftp"
URI Scheme: 'ftp:'
Functional Specification:
This ENUMservice indicates that the resource identified by the
associated URI scheme is a file service from which a file or
file listing can be retrieved.
Security Considerations:
See section 5 of [RFC 4002].
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Rudolf Brandner (rudolf.brandner&siemens.com)
Lawrence Conroy (lwc&roke.co.uk)
Richard Stastny (richard.stastny&oefeg.at)
Any other information the author deems interesting: None
[RFC 4002]
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 51]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Enumservice Name: "email"
Enumservice Type: "email"
Enumservice Subtype: "mailto"
URI Scheme: 'mailto:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the remote resource can be
addressed by the associated URI scheme in order to send an
email.
Security Considerations:
See Section 6 of [RFC 4355]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Rudolf Brandner, Lawrence Conroy, Richard Stastny (for author
contact detail see [RFC 4355])
Any other information the author deems interesting:
None
Enumservice Name: "fax"
Enumservice Type: "fax"
Enumservice Subtype: "tel"
URI Scheme: 'tel:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified by the
associated URI scheme is capable of being contacted to provide
a communication session during which facsimile documents can be
sent.
A client selecting this NAPTR will have support for generating
and sending facsimile documents to the recipient using the PSTN
session and transfer protocols specified in [12] and [13] in
[RFC 4355] - in short, they will have a fax
program with a local or shared PSTN access over which they can
send faxes.
Security Considerations:
See Section 6 of [RFC 4355]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Rudolf Brandner, Lawrence Conroy, Richard Stastny (for author
contact detail see [RFC 4355])
Any other information the author deems interesting:
None
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 52]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Enumservice Name: "sms"
Enumservice Type: "sms"
Enumservice Subtypes: "tel"
URI Scheme: 'tel:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified by the
associated URI scheme is capable of receiving a message using
the Short Message Service (SMS) [14] in [RFC 4355].
Security Considerations:
There are no specific security issues with this Enumservice.
However, the general considerations of Section 6 apply.
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Rudolf Brandner, Lawrence Conroy, Richard Stastny (for author
contact detail see [RFC 4355])
Any other information the author deems interesting:
None
Enumservice Name: "sms"
Enumservice Type: "sms"
Enumservice Subtypes: "mailto"
URI Scheme: 'mailto:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified by the
associated URI scheme is capable of receiving a message using
an email protocol.
SMS content is sent over SMTP using the format specified by TS
23.140 [15] section 8.4.4 and TS 26.140 [16] section 4 (for
references see [RFC 4355]), as an MMS message. Within such a
message, SMS content is carried as either a text or
application/octet-stream MIME sub-part (see TS 26.140 [16] ,
section 4.1)
For references see [RFC 4355].
Security Considerations:
There are no specific security issues with this Enumservice.
However, the general considerations of Section 6 apply, see
[RFC 4355].
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Rudolf Brandner, Lawrence Conroy, Richard Stastny (for author
contact detail see [RFC 4355])
Any other information the author deems interesting:
None
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 53]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Enumservice Name: "ems"
Enumservice Type: "ems"
Enumservice Subtype: "tel"
URI Scheme: 'tel:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified by the
associated URI scheme is capable of receiving a message using
the Enhanced Message Service (EMS) [14] (For reference see
[RFC 4355]).
Security Considerations:
There are no specific security issues with this Enumservice.
However, the general considerations of Section 6 apply.
See [RFC 4355]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Rudolf Brandner, Lawrence Conroy, Richard Stastny (for author
contact detail see [RFC 4355])
Any other information the author deems interesting:
Note that an indication of EMS can be taken as implying that
the recipient is capable of receiving SMS messages at this
address as well.
Enumservice Name: "ems"
Enumservice Type: "ems"
Enumservice Subtypes: "mailto"
URI Scheme: 'mailto:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified by the
associated URI scheme is capable of receiving a message using
an email protocol.
EMS content is sent over SMTP using the format specified by TS
23.140 [15] section 8.4.4 and TS 26.140 [16] section 4, as an
MMS message. Within such a message, EMS content is carried as
either a text or application/octet-stream MIME sub-part (see
TS 26.140 [16] , section 4.1).
For references see [RFC 4355]
Security Considerations:
There are no specific security issues with this Enumservice.
However, the general considerations of Section 6 of [RFC 4355]
apply.
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Rudolf Brandner, Lawrence Conroy, Richard Stastny (for author
contact detail see [RFC 4355])
Any other information the author deems interesting:
None
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 54]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Enumservice Name: "mms"
Enumservice Type: "mms"
Enumservice Subtype: "tel"
URI Scheme: 'tel:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified by the
associated URI scheme is capable of receiving a message using
the Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) [15].
For references see [RFC 4355]
Security Considerations:
There are no specific security issues with this Enumservice.
However, the general considerations of Section 6 of [RFC 4355]
apply.
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Rudolf Brandner, Lawrence Conroy, Richard Stastny (for author
contact detail see [RFC 4355])
Any other information the author deems interesting:
Note that MMS can be used as an alternative to deliver an SMS
RP-DATA RPDU if, for example, the SMS bearer is not supported.
If an entry includes this Enumservice, then in effect this can
be taken as implying that the recipient is capable of receiving
EMS or SMS messages at this address. Such choices on the end
system design do have two small caveats; whilst in practice all
terminals supporting MMS today support SMS as well, it might
not necessarily be the case in the future, and there may be
tariff differences in using the MMS rather than using the SMS
or EMS.
Enumservice Name: "mms"
Enumservice Type: "mms"
Enumservice Subtypes: "mailto"
URI Scheme: 'mailto:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified by the
associated URI scheme is capable of receiving a message using
an email protocol.
MMS messages are sent over SMTP using the format specified by
TS 23.140 [15] section 8.4.4 and TS 26.140 [16] section 4.
Within and between MMS Environments (MMSE, network
infrastructures that support the MultiMedia Service), other
pieces of state data (for example, charging-significant
information) are exchanged between MMS Relay Servers. Thus,
although these servers use SMTP as the "bearer" for their
application exchanges, they map their internal state to
specialised headers carried in the SMTP message exchanges.
The headers used in such MMSE are described in detail in [17].
For references see [RFC 4355]
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 55]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Security Considerations:
There are no specific security issues with this Enumservice.
However, the general considerations of Section 6 of [RFC 4355]
apply.
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Rudolf Brandner, Lawrence Conroy, Richard Stastny (for author
contact detail see [RFC 4355])
Any other information the author deems interesting:
The MMS Architecture describes an interface between the MMSE and
"legacy messaging systems" (labelled as MM3) which accepts
"standard" SMTP messages. Thus although the MMS Relay Server
that supports this interface appears as a standard SMTP server
from the perspective of an Internet-based mail server, it acts
as a gateway and translator, adding the internal state data that
is used within and between the MMS Environments. This mechanism
is described in [17], which also includes references to the
specifications agreed by those bodies responsible for the design
of the MMS.
Service Name: E.164 to VPIM MailTo: URL
URI Type: "Mailto:"
Type: VPIM
Subtype: MAILTO
Functional Specification: See section 4.2 through 4.4 of [RFC 4238]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Author: Greg Vaudreuil (gregv&ieee.org)
Error Conditions:
o E.164 number not in the numbering plan
o E.164 number in the numbering plan, but no URLs exist for that
number
o E2U+VPIM:Mailto Service unavailable
Security Considerations:
o Malicious Redirection
One of the fundamental dangers related to any service such as
this is that a malicious entry in a resolver's database will
cause clients to resolve the E.164 into the wrong email URL.
The possible intent may be to cause the client to send the
information to an incorrect destination.
o Denial of Service
By removing the URL to which the E.164 maps, a malicious
intruder may remove the client's ability to access the
resource.
o Unsolicited Bulk Email
The exposure of email addresses through the ENUM
service provides a bulk mailer access to large numbers
of email addresses where only the telephone number was
previously known.
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 56]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Service Name: E.164 to VPIM LDAP URL
URI Type: "LDAP:"
Type: VPIM
Subtype: LDAP
Functional Specification: See section 3.2 through 3.3 of [RFC 4238]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Author: Greg Vaudreuil (gregv&ieee.org)
Security Considerations:
o Malicious Redirection
One of the fundamental dangers related to any service
such as this is that a malicious entry in a resolver's
database will cause clients to resolve the E.164 into
the wrong LDAP URL. The possible intent may be to cause
the client to connect to a rogue LDAP server and
retrieve (or fail to retrieve) a resource containing
fraudulent or damaging information.
o Denial of Service
By removing the URL to which the E.164 maps, a
malicious intruder may remove the client's ability to
access the LDAP directory server.
Enumservice Name: "voice"
Enumservice Type: "voice"
Enumservice Subtype: "tel"
URI Scheme: 'tel:'
Functional Specification:
The kind of communication indicated by this Enumservice is
"Interactive Voice". From a protocol perspective, this
communication is expected to involve bidirectional media streams
carrying audio data.
A client may imply that the person controlling population of a
NAPTR holding this Enumservice indicates their capability to
engage in an interactive voice session when contacted using the
URI generated by this NAPTR.
Security Considerations:
See Section 5 of [RFC 4415]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors: Rudolf Brandner, Lawrence Conroy, Richard Stastny (for
author contact detail see Authors' Addresses section)
Any other information the author deems interesting:
o This Enumservice indicates that the person responsible for the
NAPTR is accessible via the PSTN (Public Switched Telephone
Network) or PLMN (Public Land Mobile Network) using the value of
the generated URI.
o The kind of subsystem required to initiate a Voice Enumservice
with this sub-type is a "Dialler". This is a subsystem that
either provides a local connection to the PSTN or PLMN, or that
provides an indirect connection to those networks. The
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 57]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
subsystem will use the telephone number held in the generated
URI to place a voice call. The voice call is placed to a
network that uses E.164 numbers to route calls to an appropriate
destination.
o Note that the PSTN/PLMN connection may be indirect. The end
user receiving this NAPTR may have a relationship with a
Communications Service Provider that accepts call initiation
requests from that subsystem using an IP-based protocol such as
SIP or H.323, and places the call to the PSTN using a remote
gateway service. In this case the Provider may either accept
requests using "tel:" URIs or has a defined mechanism to convert
"tel:" URI values into a "protocol-native" form.
o The "tel:" URI value SHOULD be fully qualified (using the
"global phone number" form of RFC 3966 [10]). A "local phone
number" as defined in that document SHOULD NOT be used unless
the controller of the zone in which the NAPTR appears is sure
that it can be distinguished unambiguously by all clients that
can access the resource record and that a call from their
network access points can be routed to that destination.
Enumservice Name: "pstn"
Enumservice Type: "pstn"
Enumservice Subtype: "tel"
URI Scheme: 'tel:'
Functional Specification:
These Enumservices indicate that the remote resource identified
can be addressed by the associated URI scheme in order to
initiate a telecommunication session, which may include two-way
voice or other communications, to the PSTN. These URIs may
contain number portability data as specified in RFC 4694 [10].
Security Considerations: See Section 7 of [RFC 4769].
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Jason Livingood (jason_livingood&cable.comcast.com)
Richard Shockey (richard.shockey&neustar.biz)
Any other information the author deems interesting:
A Number Portability Dip Indicator (npdi) should be used in
practice (see examples below in Section 4 of [RFC 4769]).
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 58]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Enumservice Name: "pstn"
Enumservice Type: "pstn"
Enumservice Subtype: "sip"
URI Scheme: 'sip:'
Functional Specification:
These Enumservices indicate that the remote resource identified
can be addressed by the associated URI scheme in order to
initiate a telecommunication session, which may include two-way
voice or other communications, to the PSTN.
Security Considerations: See Section 7 of [RFC 4769].
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Jason Livingood (jason_livingood&cable.comcast.com)
Richard Shockey (richard.shockey&neustar.biz)
Any other information the author deems interesting:
A Number Portability Dip Indicator (npdi) should be used in
practice (see examples below in Section 4 of [RFC 4769]).
Enumservice Name: "vCard"
Enumservice Name: "vCard"
Enumservice Type: "vcard"
Enumservice Subtype: n/a
URI Schemes: "http", "https"
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified is a
plain vCard, according to RFC 2426, which may be accessed using
HTTP/ HTTPS [7].
Clients fetching the vCard from the resource indicated should
expect access to be restricted. Additionally, the comprehension
of the data provided may vary depending on the client's
identity.
Security Considerations: see Section 5 [RFC 4969]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Author: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer&enum.at>
Enumservice Name: "XMPP"
Enumservice Type: "xmpp"
Enumservice Subtype: n/a
URI Schemes: "xmpp"
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified is an
XMPP entity.
Security Considerations: see Section 6 of [RFC 4979]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Author: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer&enum.at>
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 59]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Enumservice Name: "im"
Enumservice Type: "im"
Enumservice Subtypes: N/A
URI scheme(s): "im:"
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified
is an 'im:' URI. The 'im:' URI scheme does not identify
any particular protocol that will be used to handle
instant messaging receipt or delivery, rather the mechanism
in RFC 3861 [4] is used to discover whether an IM protocol
supported by the party querying ENUM is also supported by
the target resource.
Security considerations: See section 3 of [RFC 5028]
Intended usage: COMMON
Author: Rohan Mahy (rohan&ekabal.com)
Enumservice Name: "voicemsg"
Enumservice Type: "voicemsg"
Enumservice Subtypes: "sip"
URI Schemes: 'sip:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the remote resource identified
can be addressed by the associated URI scheme in order to
initiate a voice communication session to a voice messaging
system.
Security Considerations: See Section 3 of [RFC 5278]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Jason Livingood (jason_livingood&cable.comcast.com)
Don Troshynski (dtroshynski&acmepacket.com)
Any other information the author deems interesting:
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
below in Section 7 of [RFC 5278]
Enumservice Name: "voicemsg"
Enumservice Type: "voicemsg"
Enumservice Subtypes: "sips"
URI Schemes: 'sips:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the remote resource identified
can be addressed by the associated URI scheme in order to
initiate a voice communication session to a voice messaging
system.
Security Considerations: See Section 3 of [RFC 5278]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Jason Livingood (jason_livingood&cable.comcast.com)
Don Troshynski (dtroshynski&acmepacket.com)
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 60]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Any other information the author deems interesting:
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
below in Section 7 of [RFC 5278]
Enumservice Name: "voicemsg"
Enumservice Type: "voicemsg"
Enumservice Subtype: "tel"
URI Schemes: 'tel:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the remote resource identified
can be addressed by the associated URI scheme in order to
initiate a voice communication session to a voice messaging
system.
Security Considerations: See Section 3 of [RFC 5278]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Jason Livingood (jason_livingood&cable.comcast.com)
Don Troshynski (dtroshynski&acmepacket.com)
Any other information the author deems interesting:
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
below in Section 7 of [RFC 5278]
Enumservice Name: "voicemsg"
Enumservice Type: "voicemsg"
Enumservice Subtype: "http"
URI Schemes: 'http:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the remote resource identified
by the associated URI scheme is capable of being a source of
information.
Note that the kind of information retrieved can be manifold.
Usually, contacting a resource by an 'http:' [11] URI provides a
document. This document can contain references that will trigger
the download of many different kinds of information, such as
text, audio, video, executable code, or even voice message
files. Thus, one cannot be more specific about the kind of
information expected when contacting the resource.
Security Considerations: See Section 3 of [RFC 5278]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Jason Livingood (jason_livingood&cable.comcast.com)
Don Troshynski (dtroshynski&acmepacket.com)
Any other information the author deems interesting:
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
below in Section 7 of [RFC 5278]
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 61]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Enumservice Name: "voicemsg"
Enumservice Type: "voicemsg"
Enumservice Subtype: "https"
URI Schemes: 'https:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the remote resource identified
by the associated URI scheme is capable of being a source of
information, which can be contacted using TLS or the Secure
Socket Layer protocol.
Note that the kind of information retrieved can be manifold.
Usually, contacting a resource by an 'https:' [12] URI provides
a document. This document can contain references that will
trigger the download of many different kinds of information,
such as text, audio, video, executable code, or even voice
message files. Thus, one cannot be more specific about the kind
of information expected when contacting the resource.
Security Considerations: See Section 3 of [RFC 5278]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Jason Livingood (jason_livingood&cable.comcast.com)
Don Troshynski (dtroshynski&acmepacket.com)
Any other information the author deems interesting:
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
below in Section 7 of [RFC 5278]
Enumservice Name: "videomsg"
Enumservice Type: "videomsg"
Enumservice Subtypes: "sip"
URI Schemes: 'sip:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the remote resource identified
can be addressed by the associated URI scheme in order to
initiate a video communication session to a video messaging
system.
Security Considerations: See Section 3 of [RFC 5278]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Jason Livingood (jason_livingood&cable.comcast.com)
Don Troshynski (dtroshynski&acmepacket.com)
Any other information the author deems interesting:
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
below in Section 7 of [RFC 5278]
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 62]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Enumservice Name: "videomsg"
Enumservice Type: "videomsg"
Enumservice Subtypes: "sips"
URI Schemes: 'sips:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the remote resource identified
can be addressed by the associated URI scheme in order to
initiate a video communication session to a video messaging
system.
Security Considerations: See Section 3 of [RFC 5278]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Jason Livingood (jason_livingood&cable.comcast.com)
Don Troshynski (dtroshynski&acmepacket.com)
Any other information the author deems interesting:
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
below in Section 7 of [RFC 5278]
Enumservice Name: "videomsg"
Enumservice Type: "videomsg"
Enumservice Subtype: "http"
URI Schemes: 'http:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the remote resource identified
by the associated URI scheme is capable of being a source of
information.
Note that the kind of information retrieved can be manifold.
Usually, contacting a resource by an 'http:' [11] URI provides a
document. This document can contain references that will trigger
the download of many different kinds of information, such as
text, audio, video, executable code, or even video message
files. Thus, one cannot be more specific about the kind of
information expected when contacting the resource.
Security Considerations: See Section 3 of [RFC 5278]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Jason Livingood (jason_livingood&cable.comcast.com)
Don Troshynski (dtroshynski&acmepacket.com)
Any other information the author deems interesting:
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
below in Section 7 of [RFC 5278]
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 63]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Enumservice Name: "videomsg"
Enumservice Type: "videomsg"
Enumservice Subtype: "https"
URI Schemes: 'https:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the remote resource identified
by the associated URI scheme is capable of being a source of
information, which can be contacted using TLS or the Secure
Socket Layer protocol.
Note that the kind of information retrieved can be manifold.
Usually, contacting a resource by an 'https:' [12] URI provides
a document. This document can contain references that will
trigger the download of many different kinds of information,
such as text, audio, video, executable code, or even video
message files. Thus, one cannot be more specific about the kind
of information expected when contacting the resource.
Security Considerations: See Section 3 of [RFC 5278]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Jason Livingood (jason_livingood&cable.comcast.com)
Don Troshynski (dtroshynski&acmepacket.com)
Any other information the author deems interesting:
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
below in Section 7 of [RFC 5278]
Enumservice Name: "unifmsg"
Enumservice Type: "unifmsg"
Enumservice Subtypes: "sip"
URI Schemes: 'sip:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the remote resource identified
can be addressed by the associated URI scheme in order to
initiate a unified communication session to a unified messaging
system.
Security Considerations: See Section 3 of [RFC 5278]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Jason Livingood (jason_livingood&cable.comcast.com)
Don Troshynski (dtroshynski&acmepacket.com)
Any other information the author deems interesting:
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
below in Section 7 of [RFC 5278]
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 64]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Enumservice Name: "unifmsg"
Enumservice Type: "unifmsg"
Enumservice Subtypes: "sips"
URI Schemes: 'sips:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the remote resource identified
can be addressed by the associated URI scheme in order to
initiate a unified communication session to a unified messaging
system.
Security Considerations: See Section 3 of [RFC 5278]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Jason Livingood (jason_livingood&cable.comcast.com)
Any other information the author deems interesting:
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
below in Section 7 of [RFC 5278]
Enumservice Name: "unifmsg"
Enumservice Type: "unifmsg"
Enumservice Subtype: "http"
URI Schemes: 'http:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the remote resource identified
by the associated URI scheme is capable of being a source of
information.
Note that the kind of information retrieved can be manifold.
Usually, contacting a resource by an 'http:' [11] URI provides a
document. This document can contain references that will trigger
the download of many different kinds of information, such as
text, audio, video, executable code, or even video message
files. Thus, one cannot be more specific about the kind of
information expected when contacting the resource.
Security Considerations: See Section 3 of [RFC 5278]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Jason Livingood (jason_livingood&cable.comcast.com)
Don Troshynski (dtroshynski&acmepacket.com)
Any other information the author deems interesting:
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
below in Section 7 of [RFC 5278]
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 65]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Enumservice Name: "unifmsg"
Enumservice Type: "unifmsg"
Enumservice Subtype: "https"
URI Schemes: 'https:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the remote resource identified
by the associated URI scheme is capable of being a source of
information, which can be contacted using TLS or the Secure
Socket Layer protocol.
Note that the kind of information retrieved can be manifold.
Usually, contacting a resource by an 'https:' [12] URI provides
a document. This document can contain references that will
trigger the download of many different kinds of information,
such as text, audio, video, executable code, or even video
message files. Thus, one cannot be more specific about the kind
of information expected when contacting the resource.
Security Considerations: See Section 3 of [RFC 5278]
Intended Usage: COMMON
Authors:
Jason Livingood (jason_livingood&cable.comcast.com)
Don Troshynski (dtroshynski&acmepacket.com)
Any other information the author deems interesting:
Implementers should review a non-exclusive list of examples
below in Section 7 of [RFC 5278]
Enumservice Name: "ical-sched"
Enumservice Type: "ical-sched"
Enumservice Subtypes: "mailto"
URI scheme(s): 'mailto:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified can be
addressed by the associated URI used for scheduling using
Internet calendaring via Internet mail with the iMIP [6]
protocol.
Security considerations: See Section 4 of [RFC 5333].
Intended usage: COMMON
Author:
Rohan Mahy (rohan&ekabal.com)
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 66]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Enumservice Name: "ical-access"
Enumservice Type: "ical-access"
Enumservice Subtypes: "http"
URI scheme(s): 'http:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified can be
addressed by the associated URI in order to access a user's
calendar (for example free/busy status) using the CalDAV [7]
protocol for Internet calendaring.
Security considerations: See Section 4 of [RFC 5333].
Intended usage: COMMON
Author:
Rohan Mahy (rohan&ekabal.com)
Enumservice Name: "ical-access"
Enumservice Type: "ical-access"
Enumservice Subtypes: "https"
URI scheme(s): 'https:'
Functional Specification:
This Enumservice indicates that the resource identified can be
addressed by the associated URI in order to access a user's
calendar (for example free/busy status) using the CalDAV [7]
protocol for Internet calendaring.
Security considerations: See Section 4 of [RFC 5333].
Intended usage: COMMON
Author:
Rohan Mahy (rohan&ekabal.com)
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 67]
RFC 6118 Update Legacy Enumservice Registrations March 2011
Authors' Addresses
Bernie Hoeneisen
Ucom Standards Track Solutions GmbH
CH-8000 Zuerich
Switzerland
Phone: +41 44 500 52 44
EMail: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch (bernhard.hoeneisen AT ucom.ch)
URI: http://www.ucom.ch/
Alexander Mayrhofer
enum.at GmbH
Karlsplatz 1/9
Wien A-1010
Austria
Phone: +43 1 5056416 34
EMail: alexander.mayrhofer@enum.at
URI: http://www.enum.at/
Hoeneisen & Mayrhofer Standards Track [Page 68]
RFC 6118 - úplné znění
Plné znění RFC 6118:
English version: RFC 6118